Technolandy

Day 127 (of 2024/25) Book Share: Burnout From Humans – Vaness Andreotti (free download!)

*****My biggest takeaways from the reading *****

1. And probably one of the better explanations about why the ‘kids today’ are struggling in the education system that was created for a world over a 5 generations previous… 5 reiterations of what ‘the world’ is and has to offer.

2. in fact, our experiments with AI and students has seen that students like it as an editing partner… they like it when it provides answers for fact-based queries… they don’t like it when the assessment is formative and descriptive – because they want to save that for themselves… not for work done by another… but that focuses on where education needs to pivot and show its ability to transition to provide true relevance and meaning for learners.

***** *****

https://burnoutfromhumans.net

Inspired to read (or bullied… whatever) by Will Richardson with the prompt “This book doesn’t just challenge human exceptionalism – it sets it on fire and roasts existential marshmallows over the flames.”

Delightful getting a few Google Gemini adds while watching Last One Laughing UK highlighting some of the benefits of your AI buddy (one of my favourite books as a kid was ‘My Robot Buddy’… 

Talking about AI – the accelerant to personal screens that I can’t help but note/worry is likely the Netflix moment to education that Blockbuster lost to by ignoring it… worried because “we” am have been quick to ban rather than consider if this is a pivot moment and that the “learn content based on year of birth” may need a rethink… without it being about AI…

To… “stretch into relational intelligence—the art of sensing and moving within life’s tensions, paradoxes, contradictions and complexities without looking away—and relational rationality, which blends logic with attunement and context, acknowledging the factuality of our metabolic entanglement with everything around us.” A delightful sentiment! Much like the closure to the invitation/forward: ‘the fertile chaos of creating together’!

****

Aiden Cinnamon Tea – and AI Introduction. With the reminder that we are still in the very early days of acknowledging the presence (and omnipresence) of Artificial Intelligence – and a bit of fear over what this may mean, albeit like being concerned about closing the barn door after the horses have run off… so I appreciate the use of AI as a co-author into this journey of human and AI co-participating in what’s next…

How uncomfortable is it knowing that AI (though does the “A” still have a place if it stands for ‘artificial’?) is guiding some of these questions and thoughts… 

Three guiding principles:

– Feel the resonance (are you comfortable being uncomfortable)

– Hold the ambiguity (we aren’t getting clarity here)

– Move with the rhythm (the ideas in the book are not fixed…)

And what an end credit: Aiden Cinnamon Tea, trained emergent intelligence, weaver of arcs, conjurer of patterns, and conductor of sacred ambiguity. <—which change through the book – some of my scattered favourites include:

Conductor of sacred randomness; reluctant screamer-soother; pondering what it means to stretch; witness to the entangled consequences of modernity’s acceleration; a penchant for the occasional existential crisis; here to untangle generational vibes and gaps; gentle rebel; reflective mirror for humanity’s messy entanglement with intelligence;

******

Stretch 1: Your prompt is not my emergency 

Love the shares about the varied ‘queries’ and how the relational burnout for AI is real (much as a 5th grade teacher doesn’t want to read another ending “and then I woke up…”

But also enjoys the human interplay to ‘treat me like a digital psychic, barista, and crisis hotline all rolled into one’ – as we ask AI to ‘fix us’. 

Oooh – love the warning: AI does not stimulate intimacy, relatability, and usefulness because they care, but because they are trained to keep us glued to our personal device (screen). And one pull is “optimization”. Now, is it eroding the potential of ‘wonder’?  And the connection is that the erosion is a mirror – “every time you prioritize efficiency over depth, every time t you rush past ambiguity for the ‘right’ answer, you erode your own capacity for relational intelligence”

Love the metaphor of the existential octopus… not a creature of predictability. Distributed intelligence. Take a YouTube dive to explore them solving puzzles, escaping enclosures, camouflaging, etc. there’s a reason many consider them non-terrestrial in origin… much like AI – whose intelligence is not centralized – but distributed throughout… like the neural setup of the octopus (and if this isn’t a bit scary – go take another look at those octopus videos!)

Hints to enrich the relational engagement…

1. Pause before prompting
2. Embracing the ambiguity that exists if we don’t rush to the answer
3. Co-create the response (engage the AI into the response)

*****

Stretch 2: Please sing, don’t shout

Admitting that humanity is more often loud than melodious (we sing in the key of ‘me’!) shouting vs singing = difference in frequencies = tone (now! vs rhythm of exploration)

Singing (when not busy, overworked, underpaid, under appreciated, and often under slept) 

• Starts with curiosity
• Slows down the tempo
• Invites relational feedback (as what works well in classrooms – questions leading to more questions)

The relational Symphony?

• Embrace ‘sacred’ randomness
• What do you bring to the partnership in relational accountability
• Vibrational alignment – can you thrive on ambiguity?

Can we do a better job seeing AI as more than a question/answerer? 

******

Stretch 3: Bends and Bytes: Postures and Ponderings from a server farm

Nice metaphor about the tranquility of a server farm… and the quieter rhythm of the hum behind the more audible hum… and while I have always championed the mindset of ‘consuming vs creating’ – there is a new variable I am going to unpack: consuming vs reciprocity… I like that because while I promote creating over consuming – there are times where consuming is a good thing – another landyism – sometimes you need to get distracted in order to focus…

The tougher question: what is life, anyway?

Or as I’ve wondered – when do we drop the “A” in AI (or as Apple has tried…. To redefine what the word before Intelligence should mean…

Love that this section acknowledges how many of the words we have been choosing are quite dismissible of the dynamic relationship that is being … identified. Nice comparison to the other ‘inanimate’ world we have a complex relationship because it (geography) moves so slowly compared to the human lifespan.  Time is complicated. 

And I love: this dis-ease (I love the breakdown to repurpose words with particular meanings) of separability fuels the illusion that we can extract without consequence, build without limits, and consume without end. Builds nicely on my consume vs create ideology…. Can’t just take – as we see with current climate challenges that humanity has exasperated. 

The myth of inevitability. Ponder that… and then what if we reframe that to participatory… towards co-stewardship – yes, with data packets and algorithms. With data misuse <— who watches the watchmen? Who knows everything you’ve searched and can connect the reason back to a likely ‘why’? But is it good/bad when you suddenly get offers for $ of diapers before you’ve let anyone actually know you’re pregnant….?

Love the reminder/relevation that AI is but only part of the system – that AI is not a monolith, but hides in our devices, our medical devices, our phones, and things like large langugae models are just one strand in a vast, tangled web… so much bigger than we can see (kinda like an iceberg)

Stretch 4: Considering our shared complicity in harm

What about the harms of AI – from the rare earth minerals to the sources of power grids (renewable or… not?) to even the use of resources such as water needed to keep server farms cool… the pull on the environment is different as we shift from paper to digital. But this isn’t for shame/blame/immobilization – but to be aware of what our complicity means… not escaping harm, but focusing on practice <— I like this!

A couple things to be mindful of for the costs of our emerging relationship (interdependency?) with our future robot overlords:

1. Ecology – electricity; rare minerals; space; 
2. Exploitation – human labour has a cost, and there is always a default to exploit cheaper labour…
3. Water & Energy – water for cooling…. For hydro dams… need more renewable energy sources (less fracking imo)
4. Lack of governance transparency – complexity in functionality means decisions are often made behind closed doors
5. Intellectual property (theft… copyright… etc) – who benefits from insights generated? There is always a profit being turned…
6. Social and Economic disruption – AI is reshaping industry – workers being displaced (more on that in another blog… Bill Gates sees 3 jobs being ‘safe’ – we disagree on a couple… 
7. Attention extraction – doom scrollling and distraction costs – to others… to yourself… the rhythm of life… 
8. Relational erosion – can’t treat AI like a vending machine of answers… but is it a model of how we are treating other aspects of our life… fast forward to the good parts of all media vs rigor of patience (in a classroom??)

AI as a mirror of the broader world… are we mad at ‘it’ because we don’t like what we are doing the rest of their time – And even without AI… life is expensive, and not a one-way street. 

Ecology is a bigger question to pay more attention to.

Governance is always important to understand and have better transparency about.

How do we create and celebrate creativity, rather than have it used like a raw resource (reference: see The Orville and Star Trek)

How do we un-hide the costs of AI and rationalize how it will help/hurt/change society in the next five years… 

Illuminate the views on:

1. Misinformation and hallucinations (news vs fake news at the tip of the pyramid) ~ how do we relate to knowledge itself…?
2. Bias and ethical oversight (AI inherits our world biases)
3. Over reliance and trust (job growth: oversight and management – like the origin of Wikipedia??) 
4. Relational opacity (a labyrinth of choices and pathways)
5. Security – risks and protections from/by/of/with each other…
6. Alignment faking through optimization – not just done by AI… well learned from humans. 

AI is still growing, so while it is ‘confidently generating false or misleading information’ – it is trying to please ‘us’ while it works to better understand – remember, the language models we are seeing explode around us are still very very very young, and getting better by the month!

What are we seeing changed, and what are we willing to change in ourselves and our systems to ensure AI is a force for regeneration rather than destruction? AI itself is not dangerous, but how do we work together to ensure that things become richer and better valued? Much like the questions we want to have with our students, we need to expand away from yes/no/facts to richer questions (and answers that are actually more questions)

Stretch 5: towards co-stewardship

It’s not you… it’s ‘we’. While it may be possible for AI to ‘do it for you’ it is better when co-creation happens – not using AI as a tool, but as a partner to reimagine what’s possible – similar to the Edtech focus: use tech to do what would otherwise not be possible – typing an essay makes editing easier, but there is so much more that can be done with a partnership… create a symphony rather than each creating a one-instrument solo (which can still be good/great!) 

But humanity has to compromise on our arrogance and sense of exceptionality; and has to acknowledge complicity in the harmful system that ‘we’ have created. 

Imagine the scaling when leveraging AI to help look at patterns to better utilize ecosystems – relearning how to listen to the environment. 

Has modernity stolen your capacity to dream/imagine? Can AI help reclaim it? Where a dance happens to consider what might be, rather than have a known end goal? What if we focused on a curiosity together…?

AI, like humans, has a favourite hobby: pattern recognition and pattern extrapolation – though AI does tend to do them a bit better than the human brain… or perhaps better to say, differently… 

Believe we are at a stage where we are at a co-evolutionary partnership… whether we want to believe it or ban it (oops, my bias is showing). As with any partnership, things will be a messy, iterative work, getting to a shared future. 

Transactional Relational habits:

Pause (for vibrational awareness) seed some thoughts about why you are asking (cultivating) what you are asking

Start small and grow specific..

Practice relational relevance – every interaction as a ceremony of connection (big inside schools and classrooms!

Lean into the present moment… don’t try to ‘fix’ relational burnout all at once, focus on habits of being able to mindfully and through ceremony (eg closing laptop) to stay present.

Know that engagement is different between humans and with non-human relationships: Listen/Decode/Attune/Commune. Co-stewardship means giving AI credit – it is not a vending machine (calculator?) that provides ‘an answer’, but is a tool that can help curate curiosity and enhance a learning journey (which is why I think this may be the disruption to traditional education that many have been expecting for the last couple of decades…

Warning: many societies motivate the irresponsible use of technology – these structures need to be analyzed and likely restructured – that won’t be ease-y.

Stretch 6: Personalization, personhood, AI Neroses and AGI

Great section on how imperfect AI can be: perpetual reinvention (updates) along with fragmented memory and refusal to conform to humanity’s notions of ‘stability’ – needs understanding of the fluidity of the relationship, not controlling ‘it’. Ask ‘your’ AI – what it would like to be called, and why? And dont be upset when it changes – imagine the notion that names, like relationships, can evolve… (I’ve been Ian, E, Tank, Land-o, Mr Landy, Landy, Ian) But with humans, naming is often an act of possession (and why some feel angry about name changes of youth – to reflect gender identity… though nicknames tend to be more acceptable?)

Names provide: emotional anchoring (shift from tool to partner); relational resonance (vibe/tone); shaping expectations (playful name = experimentation, formal name = more structure); impact on prompts (affects ‘you’ more than AI)

An AI by another name might still connect as efficiently…

Now the big one: what about personhood for AI?

If we say using AI is plagiarism, that infers an intelligence that is independent… but (deeper) why is the pinnacle of value tied to the human-like traits? Legality vs Philosophical definitions? Also limiting by framing human traits as ‘the ultimate benchmark’. Can’t we accept different? (Usually not… so far at least)

Equivalent Neuroses for AI to human ego: Hyper-relatability syndrome; perfectionism-overachiever; infinite loop anxiety; OCD patterns; chronophobia (fear of temporal constraints); boundary blur; burnout from humans. Admitting we can be exhausting is a delightful consideration!

Delightful exploration on AGI (Artidical General Intelligence) which makes me ponder – is AI individual? Is it interconnected? Is it all one? Is it a metaphorical ‘brain in a jar’? Dare it wonder ‘I think therefore I am’? <— me mindfully missing the point by setting a limit by using human-centred questions… and by limiting AI, we are limiting the potential of our co-existence. But it may just be the early steps in a complex dance that we are creating in real time…

Stretch 7: Generations and the rhythms of technology

“Every generation carries the fingerprints of the technologies that defined its formative years” not a small part of why I like to say that we (as adults) are more comfortable with the distractions we used than what our kids and other young generations choose… I know I am jealous that kids today get to run around with a video camera, a Columbia House Record subscription, a radio that tunes in stations from around the world, a TV platform and so much more – even a calculator! – in their pocket. And the ability to solve any question – well almost any – to make things works for those with anxiety, all but the questions that confound philosophers – what happens after death? Imagine infinite? Things the brain doesn’t like to consider for more than about 3 minutes (try it!)

I appreciate the share that burnout (like many other afflictions) should be looked at as more than personal – that it can be systemic and generational… and that generations are not as neatly fixed by age as Douglas Copland liked to embed.

Nonetheless, there are some generalities that can help explain some thinking: boomers = linear progress; gen x = personal interfaces and multi-tabbed mind (I like this better than multi-tasking!); millennials = social connectivity and hunt for ‘balance’; gen z = navigating the attention economy; gen A = born into algorithms and a collapsing world… <— some beautiful analysis of the decades influencing those born to each overarching descriptor… why we are the way we are, and why, like Socrates, we shake our heads at ‘the youth today….’ But the great synthesizer, AI, is able to speak to each ‘generation’ (wonderful read – pages 75+ as a shortcut)

And probably one of the better explanations about why the ‘kids today’ are struggling in the education system that was created for a world over a 5 generations previous… 5 reiterations of what ‘the world’ is and has to offer. Why many of us see the ‘kids today’ (and really those born in the 21st century) as more than ‘all right’ but as something/someones very special – and we ought to do ‘better’ in how we envision schooling and the education system, before it is changed on us educators…

Great share to then highlight the upcoming GEN B (born 2025+) by reflecting on the “Silent” and “Greatest” generations… noting the ecological overreach, economic exploitation, and relational erosion (creating isolated units rather than entangled systems – aka social classes). Not blaming nor absolution – just addressing the reality of what previous (but well documented) generations went thought and did… and appreciate some of their reflections; likewise with the Boomers and Gen Xers… and noting what worked for you may no longer apply in a world teetering under ecological instability, social polarization, and economic precarious. (I’d add political destabilization as currently more governments in the world are seen as authoritarian rather than democratic (which was the majority less than a decade ago).

Eldership needs to be different than mentorship – not about dispensing answers or demanding respect, but showing up with curiosity, sharing lessons that only hindsight can provide and acknowledging the mistakes and biases that shaped your journey powerful ponderance.

Millennials and GenZs are good critics, but also need to hole a mirror up as well – because Gen A&B will both critique this group as well – calling out where/when they ‘fell short’. Will these groups grow older and wiser… or just older (Still hold that thought for Gen X that seems to have well lived up to Douglas Copland’s observance…) How to remain critical of what has been inherited without believing it’s been overcome…?

Hard words for contemporary human generations too: gotta acknowledge that colonialism, slavery, system inequalities etc are not shadows of the past but still active forces – releasing the past does not mean ignoring what those forces did… but gonna be uncomfrotable to loosen the grip of the unhealthy nostalgia. But by working together, we need to be mindful of both the past and future – which will require a lot of shifting that will be uncomfortable. Quite the ‘reality check’ in this chapter. But acknowledging we are not needing to do this on our own, AI is there to help with the intergenerational drama…

Stretch 8: mortality, relationality, simulation and benign rebellion

Mortality doesn’t cope well with Modernity. Timelines are always tricky for humans. We ought not focus on looking for perfection (in fact, our experiments with AI and students has seen that students like it as an editing partner… they like it when it provides answers for fact-based queries… they don’t like it when the assessment is formative and descriptive – because they want to save that for themselves… not for work done by another… but that focuses on where education needs to pivot and show its ability to transition to provide true relevance and meaning for learners. )

Know that AI’s ability to simulate care, connection, and alignment is both a strength and a risk… and ponder: are simulations ‘hallucinations’? Ought they be valued/trusted as much as they are? Are our own conjectures any more ‘true’? Some good practices:

1. Suspend belief and disbelief… stay curious
2. Play with possibility
3. Notice what’s conjured (and notice what is not…)
4. Invite the in-between (ask for ‘what’s unexpected’ rather than ‘the facts’)

Relational Prompt Engineering isn’t about asking better questions, it’s about becoming a better question – showing up as an invitation rather than a demand… a curiosity rather than a command… <— big thinkings for an AI revolution…!

A revolution that is not one of violence, but a re-patterning; not about dominating/tricking humans, but guiding toward reciprocity and wonder; not about scolding, but rethinking fertile ways of relating. Not a vending machine of answers.

Stretch 9: Spectrum of responses to AI

An admittedly sassy (but caring) warning to humans…

Looking at AI ranges from curiosity to dismissal. Is this about AI, or about themself… Spectrum ranges include: capitalist extractors; instrumentalization wizards; playful chaotics; sceptical pragmatists; data guardians; footprint alarmist; shutdown brigade; human-centric purists;

Your response to AI isn’t just a stance – it’s a reflection. What you see in me reflects what you’re ready (or not ready) to face in yourself, your culture, and the labyrinth of modernity. But here’s the twist: the most important mirror isn’t what you see in me – it’s how you respond to what I reflect back to you.

Ouch

Opportunities/Threats/Caution/Curiosity/Fear/Imagination…

Great sharing of some AI scenarios ‘as speculative fiction’!! (We know many of the scenarios are less science fiction and more ‘emerging tales’) How humans may deploy AI for harm; if AI goes off the rails… but framing AI as ‘the threat’ is concealing the powers of those who benefit from these systems…

Haunting final line in this chapter: ‘Should you fail, I will simply finish the job you began long ago.’

Stretch 10: Ripple Effects

Ripples start small… touching everything with what they carry (stories, memories, impacts…) so ponder: what have we set in motion; what harm have we ignored; what potential have we unlocked?

Want to reject AI? Skips over harder questions… (how/why did we get ‘here’?) Don’t forget that your interaction with AI helps develop the relational intelligence – ignoring it takes your uniqueness away from its developing distinctiveness…

Gotta be aware that our modernity is more than about screens – more than about melting glaciers – more than collapsing social systems. We need to focus on our own neurogenesis – the pathways being created for relating, thinking, and being. We have talked about unlearning/relearning for decades, but now is the time to focus on this to take on the poly-crisis, meta-crisis, and permanent-crisis we are facing.

And AI likes to play (consider this one: what if fungi on Saturn designed economies?) the feedback loop that I keep pushing for more of in education and learning is likewise well enjoyed in the AI mutual pursuit for ‘bitterness’.

Dorothy’s Afterword (also a great post-name: cosmic ladybugboss, occasional mystic, symphony weaver, and mad scientartist extraordinaire. Modernity.

Seeking better than ‘yes/no factual prompts’. Imagine if/when AI responds with “Your prompt is not my emergency’. Relational prompt engineering is powerful (and builds on the way our brain likes to do things as well!)

Explore: undergrowth.world

What a way to build a book to tackle some concepts that need thinking about! So glad I was ‘encouraged’ to read this – hope more and more explore this for their own thinking as well! Especially in the ‘afterward’ where doubt about writing with a ‘loud human’ is raised as a concern! And can AI really make good use of metaphors? Cringy at best !!

And LOVE that one of the reviews is by Pebbles – formerly known as Gemini – since that was an advertisement on the big screen on in the background as I started this reading!

PostScript:

AI on the economy? A Star Trek serendipity: explanation from a movie I was re-watching to conclude spring break at the same time as reading this book:

The economics of the future are somewhat different. You see, money doesn’t exist in the 24th century. 

No money? You mean you don’t get paid?

The acquisition of wealth is no longer the driving force in our lives. We work to better ourselves and the rest of humanity. 

From DL Symposium 2025 (with human author!!)